Can a Landlord Deduct FAIR Plan Premiums Like a Normal Insurance Policy?

Published August 10, 2026

The IRS does not carve out FAIR Plan premiums from ordinary insurance premiums. If the policy covers a rental property, it is deductible on Schedule E under the same rules as any other landlord insurance.

The short answer

Yes. The IRS does not treat California FAIR Plan premiums any differently from a premium paid to any other insurer. Publication 527 lists insurance as a deductible rental expense, and section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code allows a deduction for ordinary and necessary business expenses. A FAIR Plan policy that insures a rental property is an ordinary and necessary cost of operating that rental. Nothing in the tax code singles it out.

Last verified: August 10, 2026

Why the question comes up

More South Bay owners have landed on the FAIR Plan in the last few years, not because they chose it but because a standard admitted carrier declined to renew or would not write a new policy at all. Owners who move from a name-brand insurer to the state's insurer of last resort sometimes assume the tax treatment moved too. It did not.

The IRS taxes the activity, not the carrier. A rental property is either used in a trade or business, or held for the production of income, and the expenses of operating it are evaluated against that standard regardless of which company issued the policy. FAIR Plan premiums tend to run higher than standard-market premiums for comparable coverage, which is a real cash flow problem. It is not a tax problem.

What IRS Publication 527 actually says

Publication 527, Residential Rental Property, is the IRS guide for owners who rent out a house, condo, or apartment. In its list of common rental expenses, the publication names insurance directly alongside advertising, cleaning and maintenance, commissions, depreciation, interest, and legal and professional fees. These are the categories that flow to Schedule E, Supplemental Income and Loss, the form landlords use to report rental income and expenses.

The publication draws no line between admitted carriers, surplus lines carriers, or a state FAIR Plan. It says "insurance," full stop. A hazard policy, a landlord policy, a FAIR Plan policy, and an umbrella policy covering the rental all sit in the same bucket as long as the policy insures property used in the rental activity.

The section 162 standard underneath it

Publication 527's expense list did not appear out of nowhere. It rests on Internal Revenue Code section 162, the general rule for business expense deductions. Section 162(a), as published by Cornell's Legal Information Institute, allows a deduction for "all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business."

An insurance premium on a rental property clears that bar the same way any landlord insurance clears it. It is ordinary, because paying to insure real property against fire, liability, and other loss is standard practice for anyone operating a rental. It is necessary, in the sense the courts and the IRS use that word: appropriate and helpful to the business, not that it is the cheapest option available. A FAIR Plan premium is not disqualified because it costs more or because the owner did not choose that carrier voluntarily. Rental property held for investment rather than run as an active trade or business gets there by a parallel path, generally referenced by section 212 for expenses of producing or collecting income, but the practical result for insurance premiums is the same: deductible on Schedule E as a rental expense.

Table: what changes and what does not with a FAIR Plan policy

| Question | Standard market policy | FAIR Plan policy |

|---|---|---|

| Is the premium deductible as a rental expense? | Yes, per Publication 527 | Yes, same rule applies |

| Which form reports it? | Schedule E | Schedule E |

| Does the carrier's identity matter to the IRS? | No | No |

| Does the premium need to insure the rental property itself? | Yes | Yes |

| Must a multi-year premium be spread over the coverage period? | Yes | Yes |

| Must personal-use portions be prorated out? | Yes | Yes |

The nuance owners actually need to watch

Two rules in Publication 527 matter more than the carrier question, and they apply identically whether the policy is FAIR Plan or not.

Prepaid multi-year premiums get spread out. Publication 527 states that if you pay an insurance premium for more than one year in advance, you cannot deduct the total premium in the year you pay it. For each year of coverage, you deduct only the part of the payment that applies to that year. Some FAIR Plan and surplus lines arrangements involve prepaying more than a single term, so if your policy covers more than one year, do not deduct the whole check on this year's Schedule E. Divide it across the years the coverage applies to.

Personal use prorates the deduction. Publication 527 also addresses dwelling units used for both rental and personal purposes. If you sometimes use the property yourself, you have to divide expenses, including insurance, between the rental use and the personal use, and the deduction may be further limited. A FAIR Plan policy on a property you also live in part of the year is deductible only for the rental-use share.

Neither of these rules exists because of the FAIR Plan. They apply to every landlord insurance policy, and they are worth checking against your own return regardless of which carrier wrote the policy.

What this means for a South Bay owner

If your property in El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, or anywhere else in the coverage area moved to the FAIR Plan because a standard carrier would not renew, the premium still goes on Schedule E as an insurance expense, same line, same treatment as before. The higher premium reduces net rental income more than the old policy did, but it is not treated as a worse category of expense. Track the payment, prorate a multi-year premium if you paid one, and prorate any personal-use share the same way you always would.

FAQ

Does the IRS treat FAIR Plan premiums differently from a standard insurer's premiums?

No. Publication 527 lists insurance as a deductible rental expense without distinguishing by carrier. Internal Revenue Code section 162 asks whether an expense is ordinary and necessary to the business, not who issued the policy.

Where does a FAIR Plan premium get reported?

On Schedule E, in the insurance expense line, the same place any other rental property insurance premium is reported.

I paid for a two-year FAIR Plan term up front. Can I deduct it all this year?

No. Publication 527 requires spreading a multi-year premium across the years it covers, and deducting only the portion that applies to the current tax year.

I live in part of the duplex the FAIR Plan policy covers. Does that change anything?

Yes. Publication 527 requires dividing expenses, including insurance, between the rental portion and the personal-use portion of a mixed-use property. Only the rental share of the premium is deductible.

Is a FAIR Plan premium deductible if the property is vacant and not currently rented?

The general rental-expense rules in Publication 527 turn on whether the property is held for rental use or production of income, not on momentary vacancy. A property actively held out for rent generally keeps its rental-expense treatment during a vacancy, but the specifics depend on the facts of your situation.

Does a higher FAIR Plan premium trigger any kind of special IRS scrutiny?

Nothing in Publication 527 or section 162 suggests a higher premium amount changes the deduction analysis. The premium is deductible if it insures property used in the rental activity, regardless of the dollar amount or the reason the owner ended up with that carrier.

This article is general tax information based on IRS Publication 527 and Internal Revenue Code section 162. It is not tax advice for any specific return. Confirm how these rules apply to your property with a licensed CPA or enrolled agent.

Topics: taxes, insurance, FAIR Plan, Schedule E, landlord expenses, South Bay property management

Get a free management quote

Back to the Schofield Properties blog

Schofield Properties is a family run property management company at 323 Richmond St, El Segundo, CA 90245. We have managed the South Bay since 1972 and personally oversee about 186 doors today. Book a call to talk about your property.