Is Key Money or an Extra Holding Deposit Legal in Gardena?

Published August 10, 2026

California defines a security deposit by what a payment does, not what a landlord calls it. Civil Code section 1950.5 covers any charge collected at the start of a tenancy that could be used against the applicant, which pulls a Gardena holding deposit under the same cap as a security deposit, and section 1950.6 separately caps screening fees.

The short answer

California does not regulate a charge by its label. Civil Code section 1950.5 defines security as any payment, fee, deposit, or charge collected at the start of a tenancy, and caps it at one month's rent on top of the first month's rent, two months for a qualifying small landlord. A Gardena landlord who collects key money or an extra holding deposit is collecting security under that definition, whether or not the lease calls it something else.

Last verified: August 10, 2026

The statute regulates function, not the word on the receipt

Civil Code section 1950.5, subdivision (b), defines "security" as "any payment, fee, deposit, or charge, including, but not limited to, an advance payment of rent, used or to be used for" any of several purposes: compensating the landlord for a tenant's default in rent, for damage beyond ordinary wear, for cleaning at the end of the tenancy, or for remedying future defaults under the rental agreement.

Notice what that definition does not do. It does not require the payment to be called a "security deposit." It looks at what the money is for and when it was collected. A payment taken before or at the start of a tenancy that could be forfeited, kept, or applied against the applicant functions exactly like the deposits the statute was written to cap, regardless of the label a landlord puts on it, "key money," "holding deposit," "reservation fee," or anything else.

That matters because "key money" in particular describes a payment with no legitimate function other than to secure priority or advantage in getting the unit, which is not one of the purposes section 1950.5 recognizes for any deposit at all. A charge that does not fit compensating for default, damage, cleaning, or future breach is not something the statute authorizes a landlord to keep under any label.

The cap, and what breaks it

Subdivision (c) sets the general limit at an amount not exceeding one month's rent, in addition to the first month's rent paid before occupancy. A narrow exception allows a landlord who is a natural person, or a small family owned LLC owning no more than two rental properties totaling four units, to collect up to two months' rent in addition to the first month's rent.

If a Gardena landlord already collects a full security deposit at that cap and then asks for an additional holding deposit or key money on top of it to reserve the unit, the combined total is what section 1950.5 measures against. A second payment layered on top of a capped deposit does not get to exist outside the statute just because it happens earlier, at the application stage instead of at lease signing.

Subdivision (n) adds a separate rule that reinforces this: "A lease or rental agreement shall not contain a provision characterizing any security as 'nonrefundable.'" A holding deposit marketed as forfeited automatically if the applicant does not move in runs directly into that language if it otherwise functions as security under subdivision (b).

Quick reference

| Charge | How California treats it | Citation |

|---|---|---|

| Security deposit | Capped at one month's rent plus first month's rent, two months for a qualifying small landlord | Civil Code section 1950.5(c) |

| Holding deposit that could be forfeited or applied against the applicant | Functions as security and is measured against the same cap | Civil Code section 1950.5(b) |

| Key money, paid to secure priority or advantage with no refund path | Not a recognized purpose for any deposit under the statute | Civil Code section 1950.5(b) |

| Labeling any deposit "nonrefundable" | Prohibited in the lease or rental agreement | Civil Code section 1950.5(n) |

| Application screening fee | Capped, starting at $30 per applicant, adjusted annually for inflation since 1998 | Civil Code section 1950.6 |

Screening fees are a separate, smaller bucket

Civil Code section 1950.6 covers a different charge entirely, the fee to actually screen an applicant, credit check and reference verification. That fee is capped at an amount tied to actual out of pocket cost plus reasonable time, starting at thirty dollars per applicant and adjusted each year for inflation since January 1, 1998. A landlord who charges this fee must give the applicant an itemized receipt showing the expenses and time involved, and must provide a copy of any consumer credit report obtained.

The screening fee cannot be used as a backdoor holding deposit. It is meant to cover the cost of the background check, not to compensate the landlord for taking the unit off the market while the applicant decides, and it does not fall under the section 1950.5 cap because it is not held or applied against the applicant, it is spent on the check itself.

What this means for a Gardena rental in practice

1. If you want a payment to hold a unit while an applicant finalizes paperwork, treat it as part of the security deposit from day one and apply it toward the deposit or first month's rent at lease signing. Do not layer it on top of a deposit already at the statutory cap.
2. Never advertise or write into a form that a holding payment is nonrefundable. If it functions as security under section 1950.5, that language is void.
3. Charge the screening fee separately, keep it at or under the current adjusted cap, and provide the itemized receipt and any credit report copy the statute requires.
4. Do not accept a payment whose only purpose is priority over other applicants. That is what "key money" describes, and it does not fit any purpose the statute recognizes for a deposit of any kind.

FAQ

Can a Gardena landlord charge a holding deposit to reserve a unit before the lease is signed?

A payment collected before the lease that could be forfeited or applied against the applicant is treated as security under Civil Code section 1950.5's broad definition, and counts toward the same cap as the security deposit, one month's rent plus first month's rent, or two months for a qualifying small landlord.

Is key money ever legal in California?

A payment whose only purpose is to secure priority over other applicants does not fit any of the purposes section 1950.5 recognizes for a deposit, compensating for default, damage, cleaning, or future breach. This research did not find a statutory basis for treating it as a lawful separate charge.

What is the difference between a holding deposit and a screening fee?

A screening fee under Civil Code section 1950.6 pays for the actual cost of checking the applicant's credit and references and is capped separately, currently adjusted from a $30 base set in 1998. A holding deposit is money kept by the landlord to secure the unit, which functions as security under section 1950.5.

Can a landlord say a holding deposit is nonrefundable?

No. Civil Code section 1950.5, subdivision (n), prohibits characterizing any security as nonrefundable in the lease or rental agreement, and a holding deposit that functions as security falls under that same rule.

How much can a Gardena landlord charge in total deposits and fees?

The security deposit, including any payment that functions as security regardless of its label, is capped at one month's rent plus the first month's rent, or two months' rent plus first month's rent for a qualifying small landlord. The separate screening fee is capped at its own, much smaller, inflation adjusted amount.

Does this analysis rely on a court case naming holding deposits specifically?

No published case applying section 1950.5 by name to a holding deposit was verified in this research. The conclusion here follows directly from the statute's own definition of security, not from case law.

This is general information, not legal advice. Confirm your specific deposit and fee structure with a licensed attorney before adopting it for a Gardena rental.

Topics: compliance, landlord law, deposits, South Bay, Gardena

Get a free management quote

Back to the Schofield Properties blog

Schofield Properties is a family run property management company at 323 Richmond St, El Segundo, CA 90245. We have managed the South Bay since 1972 and personally oversee about 186 doors today. Book a call to talk about your property.