A court just revived the Venice Dell project

Published July 18, 2026

In June 2026 a judge ruled the city overstepped when it blocked the 120 unit Venice Dell project, reviving supportive housing officials had called dead.

The short version. In June 2026 a Los Angeles Superior Court judge found the city's Transportation Commission exceeded its authority when it blocked Venice Dell, the 120 unit affordable and supportive housing project on the LADOT lot at Venice Boulevard and Dell. That revives a plan officials had called dead, one carrying a $42.4 million state grant against a roughly $133 million budget. Meanwhile Abbot Kinney is getting two hotels and short term rental rules got real teeth. Here is the plain read.

Venice fights about everything, and it fights in public and in court. This summer three of those long running fights actually moved, and if you own here they add up to more than the headlines let on. So let me give you the manager's version instead.

The corner project that came back from dead

For years the word on Venice Dell, also known as the Reese Davidson Community, was that it was finished. The city's own Transportation Commission had blocked it, and everyone read that as the end of the road. Then in June a judge disagreed. Urbanize reported the ruling: the court found the commission exceeded its authority in stopping the 120 unit affordable and supportive development on the LADOT parking lot at Venice Boulevard and Dell Avenue, and the project is alive again.

Why did this drag on for so long? Follow the money. The project holds a $42.4 million state grant, and the reported budget runs to about $133 million. That gap is the whole fight compressed into a single line. A revived Venice Dell means a big piece of long stalled housing may finally move on a site plenty of owners drive past on their way to the beach.

The politics of it are not my department. What matters to you is simpler. A 120 unit project that was dead is now not dead, on a corner near the sand, and that shifts the math for anyone holding property nearby.

Two hotels, and what capital is really saying

While one fight played out in a courtroom, money was quietly casting a vote somewhere else. Abbot Kinney, already close to full retail occupancy, is getting two hotels. There is the 78 room Venice Place on the north end, and a 43 room project at 881 Abbot Kinney on the Main Street corner.

Nobody builds two hotels into a soft market. They build where operators are confident people will keep showing up and paying to be there. That confidence is the real story under the news. Hotel money and near full retail on your commercial spine are saying the same thing about demand for a Venice address, and residential sits right on top of that same demand.

The rarefied end of it shows up in the sale numbers. The Venice Canals posted a median around $5.1 million as of March 2026, up roughly 54.7 percent year over year, according to Redfin's neighborhood tracker. That figure jumps month to month and the Canals are their own tiny world, so read it as a mood rather than a comp for your building. The mood is not weak.

The rule that actually lands on your rental

The court win and the hotels are the fun part. This next bit is the part you actually act on. If you have ever thought about running a unit as a short term rental, or you already do, the ground moved under you.

California passed the Short Term Rental Facilitator Act, SB 346, in 2025. The practical effect is that local governments can now compel platforms like Airbnb and Vrbo to hand over host and property data. The city has been pulling non compliant listings since 2025. A quiet unregistered listing can no longer count on flying under the radar, because the platform itself can be made to name you.

In Venice the layer is thicker than anywhere else in the city. On top of the citywide home sharing cap, which holds most hosts to 120 nights a year, the coastal zone adds a Coastal Development Permit question. A short term rental here can trip the citywide rules and the coastal rules in the same breath. If your Venice thesis quietly assumed nightly rental income, that assumption now needs a real compliance answer instead of a hope. Worth confirming your exact situation with a licensed professional before you list.

None of this makes your building worth a dollar less. It tightens the rules around one specific use of it, and it quietly rewards the owner who runs clean and registered over the one who runs in the gray.

Where that leaves you

Start with the short term rental question, because it is the one thing on this list you can get wrong fastest. Get square with the rules now, not after a takedown notice arrives. Between SB 346 and the coastal permit layer, Venice is one of the least forgiving corners of the county to wing it, and a registered, compliant operation is the only kind worth running here.

Venice Dell reads as a demand story, not a threat. New supportive housing on a nearby lot does not weaken a well run market rate rental. It means more people, more services, and more daily activity around a corridor that already commands a premium. And when the Canals median flashes across your feed, enjoy the number but do not let it set your expectations. A record price in one of the rarest pockets in Venice is a great headline and a terrible comp. Price your unit off your unit.

If you want a second read on any of this against your specific building, that is the kind of call I like taking.

This is general information, not legal or tax advice. Confirm with a licensed professional before you act.

Topics: market, venice, westside, development, short-term-rental

Back to the Schofield Properties blog

Schofield Properties is a family run property management company at 323 Richmond St, El Segundo, CA 90245. We have managed the South Bay since 1972 and personally oversee about 186 doors today. Book a call to talk about your property.